Thursday Night Links

• In the fifteenth century, everything changed. The human mind discovered a means of perpetuating itself which was not only more lasting and resistant than architecture but also simpler and easier. Architecture was dethroned. The lead characters of Gutenberg succeeded the stone characters of Orpheus. The book was to kill the building. The invention of the printing-press is the greatest event in history. It was the mother of revolutions. It was the total renewal of man's mode of expression, the human mind sloughing off one form to put on another, a complete and definitive change of skin by that symbolic serpent which, ever since Adam, has represented the intelligence. In its printed form, thought is more imperishable than ever; it is volatile, elusive, indestructible. It mingles with the air. In the days of architecture, thought had turned into a mountain and taken powerful hold of a century and of a place. Now it turned into a flock of birds and was scattered on the four winds occupying every point of air and space simultaneously. [Victor Hugo]
• The mainstreaming of FLNG technology represents a major development in hydrocarbon extraction technology—one that vastly expands resource viability worldwide and even pushes the phony concept of peak cheap oil further into the distant future than it already was, not that it was ever really on the horizon. If one plays forward the pace of development by a decade, the potential for change in global molecular flows is substantial. Let’s indulge in some informed speculation and ponder the consequences before they become common knowledge. [Doomberg]
• Recently, a handful of REITs have sold themselves, with the premiums to their share prices ranging from ~25% to ~40%. Historically, over the long run, you have generally seen premiums of at least 20% to a company’s recently traded share price. As you have seen from our previously published portfolio appraisals, the private market would value our assets at a much higher per share price than we are currently trading. All these factors, absent our value gap being closed by or before we complete our portfolio transformation, lead me to the conclusion that if we can’t get it done, then we need to give you a better choice. So, you have my word, that we will do everything in our power to close this value gap within 24 months or less. If someone comes knocking sooner, and they can rapidly close the value gap (increasing your net worth sooner), then let’s dance. However, for all those shops out there reading this thinking we are distressed or desperate, please don’t waste your time because we won’t waste ours. [Modiv Industrial, Inc.]
• See, one of the benefits of having been in the business for almost a quarter of a century directly, and before that I was an investment banker, and my clients were airlines, so I had more time doing that too, so I’ve had a good look at this industry, and here’s the great thing about it, is that in the long run, travel always grows slightly better than GDP. We’re talking global now. Okay? Now, there’s going to be some volatility. And when you have something like a pandemic, or the great recession of 2008, and 2009, and things there, or even earlier, the dot-com implosion recessions, the early part of this century, you always have these issues of, will it come back? And it always does. And that’s the great thing. So, I know there are going to be some soft times, there are going to be some great times. Like when we came out of the pandemic, there was that revenge travel surge, which is fantastic. But the truth is, I know that that couldn’t possibly last because in the end, we’re going to end up in a long-term run where travel goes slightly better than GDP. [Glenn Fogel]
• Mr. Trump told Mr. Huang that when he spoke with Mr. Xi about the island, China’s leader would breathe heavily, said one of these people who was briefed on the conversation. The president didn’t like it. He urged Mr. Huang to make chips in America. [NY Times]
• The rewrite man is a concession to the simple fact that many very good reporters can’t write; when they try to, the consequences can be disastrous. There’s a certain psychological sense to this. Writing well is basically a solitary, introspective activity; it is often time-consuming, and it usually is built on wide reading, another solitary activity. Reporting is fundamentally social and generally its products demand a quick turnaround. (The contradiction between these two, a brother in the trade once suggested to me, is why journalists run to alcoholism—they tend to be basically antisocial people who spend much of their time talking to people.) [The Lamp]
• Mexico could be at a crossroads, in the similar way, to how the Colombian government killed Pablo Escobar in 1994 and violence started to dramatically decrease from that point onward. And, with the election of Uribe, a forceful anti-narcos president in 2002, that set the stage for the final Colombian military offensives that crushed the remaining organized narco forces. FARC began peace talks with the Colombian government in 2012 and the definitive peace treaty was reached in 2016. Medellin went from the world’s single most dangerous city in 1994 to one of the world’s fastest-growing tourism destinations by the late 2010s. I don’t pretend to have a timeline for when Mexico can deescalate with the cartels in the same way that Peru crushed the Shining Path terrorists or Colombia neutralized the FARC. That said, Sheinbaum is making the right moves, and she has the mandate of the people to keep using overwhelming force rather than standing down or trying to coexist. From a long-term Mexico perspective, you should be more bullish today than you were last week. This has been an impressive show of force and discipline by the Mexican government and military to take down the country’s most wanted man and his immediate replacement in short order at modest cost of life -- and then getting CJNG to stop the retaliation attacks within 48 hours. [Ian Bezek]
• What's important to remember, is that the most resilient technology businesses aren't selling a product. They're selling convenience, trust, reliability, and business process knowledge. Maybe 20% of a software company's value is in the code itself. The other 80% is a customer service business – constant maintenance, security patches, compliance updates, new integrations, new features. Most businesses don't want the responsibility for any of this. They're not buying code. They're buying headache-free, all-in-one solutions to their problems. Software business also have immense “economies of scale”. As they sell more licenses, the incremental cost per license decreases (sometimes to zero). So instead of millions of businesses each vibe-coding the same product independently, isn't it more efficient for a single company to centralize production and maintenance, then sell it to all of them? By aggregating these customers' software budgets, they can also attract the best talent and invest in the best technology – something no individual customer could justify on their own. [Fred Liu]